Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Scalable tools for Parkinson's disease (PD) detection are needed beyond laboratory-bound assessments. We present and evaluate a deliberately minimalist approach: a single six-axis IMU per shoe coupled with a lightweight 1D-CNN, tested during a six-minute walk test (6MWT) conducted indoors and outdoors under semi-controlled conditions. Eighty-nine participants (44 PD; 45 healthy controls) were instrumented bilaterally at 50 Hz. Signals (accelerometer and gyroscope) were standardized to a common shoe-referenced frame and ingested as raw time series using 0.5-s non-overlapping windows. The network used three tapered convolutional blocks (32-16-8 filters) with global average pooling (2,818 parameters). Evaluation employed participant-level, stratified 5-fold cross-validation repeated across seeds. At the foot level, overall accuracy was 80.58% (sensitivity 74.76%, specificity 85.55%). Applying a clinically motivated one-foot-positive criterion (OFPC), classifying a participant as PD if either foot was positive, improved patient-level performance to 82.1% accuracy, with 84.78% sensitivity and 80.29 specificity. Indoor performance (accuracy 81.48%, sensitivity 91.89%, specificity 72.73%,) exceeded outdoor sensitivity, whereas outdoor testing maintained higher specificity (accuracy 82.17%, sensitivity 80%, specificity 83.91%), reflecting expected context variability. Compact architecture and short, non-overlapping windows minimize memory, computation and latency, supporting on-device deployment on resource-constrained wearables. These results indicate that a foot-mounted, single-modality IMU set-up combined with a compact CNN can deliver clinically meaningful PD discrimination under ecologically relevant conditions, providing a practical pathway toward real-time case identification and follow-up in routine care while preserving scalability and usability.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.