SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Plasma concentration threshold and risk factors for amantadine-induced central nervous system toxicity in Parkinson's disease.

J Clin Neurosci · 2026-06-17

DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2026.112153PMID: 42308969

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundAmantadine is an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD), yet its clinical utility is often limited by central nervous system (CNS) toxicity, particularly in elderly patients and those with renal impairment. The precise relationship between plasma amantadine concentration and the onset of CNS toxicity remains poorly defined.ObjectiveTo identify clinical risk factors for amantadine-induced CNS toxicity and to explore the diagnostic value of plasma amantadine concentration as a predictor of toxicity.MethodsThis cross-sectional study analyzed 92 patients with PD receiving amantadine (46 with CNS toxicity; 46 controls). Plasma amantadine concentrations were determined using gas chromatography. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were employed to identify predictors of CNS effects and amantadine exposure. A clinical nomogram was developed, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate discriminatory performance.ResultsAdvanced age, higher amantadine dosage, and elevated serum creatinine were significantly associated with both the incidence of CNS toxicity and higher plasma concentrations. Nonlinear modeling indicated a sharp increase in the probability of CNS toxicity in patients aged ≥77 years or with creatinine clearance ConclusionsCNS toxicity from amantadine is driven by a complex interplay of age-related and pharmacokinetic factors. Our proposed nomogram and concentration threshold provide a framework for individualized dosing and proactive monitoring to enhance treatment safety in vulnerable PD populations.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.