SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Autonomic Nervous System Phenotyping Across Chronic Demyelinating Peripheral Neuropathies: A Comparative Study.

J Peripher Nerv Syst · 2026-06-01

DOI: 10.1111/jns.70135PMID: 42321147

Open accessComparative Study; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background and aimsThis study aimed to systematically phenotype autonomic nervous system (ANS) involvement in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance-associated neuropathy (MGUS-PNP), Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Type 1A (CMT1A), and hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP).MethodsAutonomic symptoms were assessed using the SCales for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease-Autonomic Dysfunction (SCOPA-AUT). Muscle strength and functional disability were evaluated using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability scale, and the Overall Neuropathy Limitation Scale (ONLS).ResultsA total of 343 participants were included: 98 with CIDP (mean age: 59.2 ± 13.2 years), 51 with MGUS-PNP (66.0 ± 11.3 years), 51 with CMT1A (51.2 ± 13.1 years), 18 with HNPP (40.6 ± 15.1 years), and 125 healthy controls (58.2 ± 13.3 years). Compared with healthy controls, patients with CIDP, MGUS-PNP, and CMT1A showed significantly higher total SCOPA-AUT scores (p InterpretationPatients with CIDP, MGUS-PNP, and CMT1A exhibit a substantial autonomic symptom burden with distinct disease-specific ANS patterns. These findings highlight the relevance of autonomic dysfunction in immune-mediated and hereditary neuropathies and warrant further studies to clarify their clinical and prognostic significance.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.