NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundCognitive impairments in Parkinson's disease (PD) commonly affect executive function, attention, and visuospatial abilities. These deficits may precede motor symptoms and are often undetected by screening tools such as the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE). The utility of the Dynamic Lowenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment-Geriatric Version (DLOTCA-G) has not been evaluated in older adults with PD. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of DLOTCA-G in detecting cognitive deficits in PD patients with and without cognitive impairment.MethodsIn this prospective controlled study, 90 participants aged 65 and above were recruited: 30 PD patients with cognitive impairment (PD-CI), 30 PD patients without cognitive impairment (PD-NCI), and 30 healthy controls. All participants underwent cognitive assessment using SMMSE and DLOTCA-G. The total SMMSE score and eight subscales of the DLOTCA-G were analyzed.ResultsExcept for the spatial perception score, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups in all DLOTCA-G subscales. The PD-CI group had significantly lower awareness and visuomotor construction scores than the PD-NCI and healthy groups (p ConclusionThe results indicate that DLOTCA-G subscales associated with executive function are impaired in individuals with PD, even in the absence of cognitive impairment. These findings suggest that DLOTCA-G may offer a more differentiated cognitive profile than SMMSE across multiple domains, although its comparative sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy require further validation in studies using comprehensive neuropsychological references.Trial registrationThe study was retrospectively registered (registration number NCT06131619), prospective registration prior to participant enrollment was not completed due to logistical reasons. Protocol adherence was maintained throughout the study.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.