SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Progressive orexin A positive neuron loss in the 6-OHDA mouse model of Parkinson's disease: a pilot study with validation of an orexin A immunohistochemistry protocol for paraffin-embedded tissue.

Brain Res · 2026-06-20

DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2026.150437PMID: 42323123

Check source for accessValidation Study; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The aim of this pilot study was to assess a time-dependent loss of orexin neurons in the unilateral intrastriatal 6-OHDA mouse model and to optimise the immunohistochemistry protocol for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded mouse brain tissue. A progressive loss of orexin A positive neurons in the lateral hypothalamus was observed in the lesioned side relative to the non-lesioned side. A significant reduction of orexin A positive neurons in the lateral hypothalamus was observed at 4 weeks with further loss at 6-8 weeks post 6-OHDA induction. Orexin neuron loss in the lateral hypothalamus has been reported in post-mortem Parkinson's disease patients and multiple animal studies, particularly in rats; however, evidence in neurotoxic mouse models remains limited. Orexin A positive neuron loss occurred alongside transient motor deficits, olfactory impairments, subtle cognitive changes and gastrointestinal dysfunction. Additionally, an orexin A immunohistochemistry protocol was successfully established for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded mouse brain tissue, enabling reproducible and reliable detection of orexin neurons as an alternative to frozen sections. This pilot study serves as a proof of concept that the unilateral intrastriatal 6-OHDA mouse model can successfully recapitulate the progressive loss of orexin A positive neurons and validates this model's suitably for investigating the longitudinal mechanisms of PD symptoms and pathology.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.