SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Resolving Complex Structural Variants in Undiagnosed Rare Movement Disorders via Multimodal Genomics and Multi-omics.

Mov Disord · 2026-07-09

DOI: 10.1002/mds.70427PMID: 42421598

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundLong-read sequencing and multi-omic analytical frameworks are increasingly being adopted in rare disease diagnostics. However, clinical workflows comprehensively integrating these methodologies remain uncommon.ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the potential and limitations of integrating long-read genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic analyses to characterize complex structural variants.MethodsTwo unrelated patients presenting with dystonia and comorbid neurological features underwent nanopore-based long-read DNA sequencing. In patient 1, complementary transcriptomic and proteomic analyses were performed.ResultsThe workflow enabled the identification and characterization of two pathogenic complex structural variants: a homozygous AluY-mediated inversion disrupting PANK2, underlying neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation (patient 1), and a heterozygous de novo 16p13.3 duplication-triplication event associated with an atypical dystonia-parkinsonism phenotype (patient 2).ConclusionsOur findings underscore the diagnostic potential of integrated long-read and multi-omic approaches for complex structural variant characterization, while illustrating persistent limitations of automated pipelines and highlighting unpredictable relationships between genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic findings. © 2026 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.