SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Selective Recovery of Flavanone-Enriched Fractions from Glycyrrhiza Glabra Leaves by Supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> Extraction with Neuroprotective Potential.

Antioxidants (Basel) · 2026-07-14

DOI: 10.3390/antiox15070874PMID: 42510605

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Glycyrrhiza glabra leaves (GGL) are an underutilized by-product of the licorice supply chain and a valuable source of bioactive flavanones. In this study, supercritical CO2 fluid extraction (SFE-CO2) was optimized for the selective recovery of leaf-exudate flavanones (pinocembrin, licoflavanone, and glabranin). Response surface methodology combined with UHPLC-UV profiling enabled the identification of optimal conditions, yielding high-purity (31% flavanones), solvent-free, and ready-to-use enriched extracts. SFE-CO2 outperformed solvent-based liquid extraction in terms of selectivity and enrichment capacity. Path2Green assessment indicated an environmentally sustainable and scalable profile. The extract exhibited antioxidant and anti-aging effects in a yeast model of Parkinson's disease (PD), extending lifespan and reducing oxidative stress. Pinocembrin, the most abundant flavanone, inhibited α-synuclein aggregation in vitro and ameliorated PD-related phenotypes in a Drosophila melanogaster model, improving locomotor performance and increasing cellular energy metabolism. These results support the sustainable valorization of GGL into flavanone-enriched extracts with potential nutraceutical applications for aging-related disorders.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.