SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

A Smart Shoe System for Gait Analysis and Remote Monitoring in Parkinson's Disease-A Validation Study.

Sensors (Basel) · 2026-07-13

DOI: 10.3390/s26144446PMID: 42515329

Open accessresearch-article; Validation Study; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Continuous gait monitoring is important in Parkinson's Disease (PD) as gait deteriorates with disease progression and responses to treatment vary over time. Wearable sensor systems offer a practical alternative to laboratory-based gait assessment for real-world monitoring. This study aimed to (1) validate spatiotemporal gait parameters derived from the NUSHU smart shoe system against the Vicon motion capture system in healthy older adults and individuals with PD, and (2) assess whether measurement agreement was maintained during active vibrotactile feedback delivery. Thirty-two participants (17 with mild to moderate PD and 15 age- and gender-matched healthy older adults; mean age 67 ± 7.4 years) completed overground walking trials under no vibration, stance phase vibration, and swing phase vibration conditions. A total of 4790 strides were analysed using linear mixed effects models. Overall agreement was good for stride length (ICC = 0.894, CCC = 0.926), stride time (ICC = 0.853, CCC = 0.954), and velocity (ICC = 0.885, CCC = 0.940), with moderate agreement for double support time (ICC = 0.752, CCC = 0.477). Agreement remained consistent across vibration conditions in both groups. The NUSHU system demonstrates acceptable validity for stride length, stride time, and velocity under both measurement and active feedback modes.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.