SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Reluctance to Video Recording in Functional Movement Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Brain Behav · 2026-08-01

DOI: 10.1002/brb3.71638PMID: 42518118

Open accessbrief-report; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundVideo recording is an important tool for education in movement disorders, particularly in functional movement disorders (FMD). In this study, we examined factors associated with patients' consent to video recording during the neurological examination in individuals with functional and other movement disorders.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, patients with FMD (n = 42), essential tremor (ET) (n = 18), isolated dystonia (n = 34), and Parkinson's disease (PD) (n = 34) underwent a standardized neurological examination. Patients were asked to consent to video recording of the examination. The primary outcome was consent to video recording (yes/no). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL), anxiety, depression, and personality traits were assessed using questionnaires.ResultsOf the 128 included patients, 78.9% consented to video recording. Patients with FMD were more likely to refuse video recording than patients with non-FMDs (OR = 4.20, 95% CI (1.73-10.20), p = 0.002). Female sex was associated with a lower likelihood of consenting to be filmed (OR = 0.34, 95% CI (0.12-0.97), p = 0.044). No differences in HRQoL, anxiety, depression, or personality traits were found between patients who declined and those who consented to be filmed.ConclusionsPatients with FMD were more reluctant to be filmed during the neurological examination than patients with non-FMDs. This difference cannot be explained by sex, comorbidities, or personality traits alone but instead may reflect factors specific to FMD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.