Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
ObjectiveTo examine short-term associations among position-dependent executive performance and cerebral hemodynamic changes using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in participants with Parkinson's disease (PD) with and without orthostatic hypotension (OH).MethodsTwenty-nine nondemented participants with PD (19 without OH (OH-), 10 with OH (OH+)) completed a verbal fluency test (VFT) in supine and upright positions on a tilt table, while their cerebral oxygenation was continuously monitored using a full-head fNIRS system. Age-adjusted ANCOVA examined the interaction effects of OH status and position on VFT scores, while linear mixed-effects models assessed changes in oxygenated (HbO) and deoxygenated hemoglobin (HbR) within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).ResultsA significant interaction between OH status and position emerged for letter fluency (p = 0.043, ηp2 = 0.148), with the OH+ group demonstrating poorer performance and more errors while upright. fNIRS analyses revealed that OH+ participants exhibited reduced HbR in both left (p = 0.010, d = 0.73, 95% CI: [0.19, 1.27]) and right DLPFC (p = 0.011, d = 0.73, 95% CI: [0.19, 1.27]) when upright, suggesting increased utilization of cognitive resources. No participants reported orthostatic symptoms during the cognitive task.ConclusionsDespite lack of OH symptomatology, PD OH+ individuals demonstrated impaired cerebral hemodynamic regulation when upright, which was associated with poorer cognitive performance.SignificancefNIRS-derived measures for monitoring cerebral hemodynamics in patients with autonomic failure may provide a clinically relevant indicator of postural changes in brain dysfunction.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.