SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Long-term real-world effectiveness of carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension after 36 months of treatment initiation in advanced Parkinson's disease in the US: final results from the PROviDE study.

Clin Park Relat Disord · 2026-07-26

DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2026.100488PMID: 42571531

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Introduction: Clinical trials and observational studies have demonstrated that carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension (CLES) significantly improves advanced Parkinson's disease (aPD) symptoms. This study examined the real-world, long-term impact of CLES on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in people with aPD. Methods: Pursuing Real-World Outcomes via Duopa Ecosystem (PROviDE) was a 36-month prospective, observational study evaluating the effectiveness of CLES in patients with aPD in the US. PROs were collected at baseline, 3 months, and every 6 months after CLES initiation and included OFF-time, Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9), and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-8 (PDQ-8) assessing PD-related quality of life (QoL). Longitudinal treatment effects were evaluated using mixed-effect models. Results: Of 104 patients, 47 (45.2%) provided 36 months of data and were evaluated in the final mixed-model analysis. Patients mean standard deviation (SD) age was 67.0 (8.7) years with a mean (SD) PD diagnosis of 11.0 (6.2) years. Compared with baseline, CLES resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in hours of OFF-time as early as month 3 (mean: -2.7 h/day, p p = .004). Improvements were also observed in treatment effectiveness (≥19 points, all p p p = .001) with no worsening over time. Conclusion: Long-term treatment with CLES provides significant and clinically meaningful reduction in OFF-time, patient's treatment satisfaction, and maintained QoL in the real-world setting.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.