SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Insulin like growth factor and cytokine signalling predict future cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease.

Neurobiol Dis · 2026-08-09

DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2026.107570PMID: 42571858

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Cognitive impairment is a common non-motor sym.ptom of neurodegenerative Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the onset and severity of cognitive impairment is heterogenous and currently cannot be predicted. This makes it challenging for informing patients in advance, and for the application of early therapeutic interventions. Moreover, the biological pathways that underlie cognitive impairment in PD remain to be fully determined. To better predict and understand the biological pathways involved in cognitive impairment, we have integrated multimodal datasets including clinical, demographic, biomarker and high throughout proteomic data from the longitudinal Parkinson's progression markers initiative (PPMI). The integrated dataset was used to develop three machine learning models that could predict the development of cognitive impairment nine years in the future, compared to patients that remained cognitively normal over the same duration. The best model could predict future cognitive impairment with 88% area under the curve. Permutation feature importance revealed that cytokine, interleukin-2 (IL-2) and insulin like growth factor (IGF) signalling were significant biological pathways contributing to the prediction of future cognitive impairment.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.