SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Spatiotemporal gait parameters during turning differ in Parkinson's disease patients with and without freezing of gait.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2026-08-10

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2026.1878271PMID: 42638740

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionTurning is a complex locomotor task that can accentuate gait impairments and precipitate freezing of gait (FOG) in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, gait-derived spatiotemporal parameters during inter-episodic turning remain incompletely characterized. We compared turning-related gait patterns among healthy older adults, patients with PD without FOG, and patients with PD and a history of FOG.MethodsTen healthy older controls, 10 patients with PD without FOG (PD-P), and 10 patients with PD and FOG (FOG-P) performed 90°, 180°, and 360° turns while undergoing optical motion capture. Spatiotemporal gait parameters were analyzed using Bayesian generalized linear models. Trials containing observable FOG episodes were excluded; consequently, the analyses represent inter-episodic turning rather than freezing episodes themselves.ResultsCompared with controls, PD-P participants demonstrated reduced stride width of the internal leg and increased stride width of the external leg, whereas FOG-P participants demonstrated shorter step and stride lengths. Both PD groups predominantly used step-out or mixed turning strategies and required more time and steps to complete larger-amplitude turns.DiscussionGait-derived spatial parameters during turning differed between the PD groups. PD-P participants showed more pronounced mediolateral foot-placement differences, whereas FOG-P participants showed more pronounced reductions in anteroposterior step and stride length. Because the groups differed in overall motor severity and the analyses were intentionally restricted to inter-episodic turning, these findings should be interpreted as descriptive turning gait patterns in patients with a history of FOG rather than as evidence of FOG-specific mechanisms.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.