SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Maximal Handgrip Strength as a Measure of General Functional Capacity Rather than Parkinson's Disease-Specific Impairment.

Brain Sci · 2026-08-17

DOI: 10.3390/brainsci16080871PMID: 42651179

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background/Objectives: Gait impairment and reduced handgrip strength are common in Parkinson's disease (PD), but their relationship remains unclear. This study examined whether associations between handgrip force and gait reflect PD-specific impairment or broader functional capacity. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 45 individuals with PD and 51 healthy older adults completed unilateral maximal isometric handgrip testing and overground gait assessment at preferred and maximal speed. Handgrip variables included peak force (PF), rate-of-force development (RFD), and impulse. Gait speed, cadence, and step length were recorded. Results: PF was significantly associated with gait speed and step length in both groups, especially under maximal-speed conditions. RFD and impulse were not significantly associated with gait performance in either group. Compared to controls, participants with PD showed poorer gait performance, with lower preferred walking speed and shorter step length in both gait conditions. Within the PD group, PF was lower on the more-affected side than on the less-affected side, whereas most RFD and impulse variables showed no side differences. Conclusions: Maximal handgrip strength, but not upper-limb RFD or impulse, was associated with key gait outcomes in both PD and healthy older adults. These findings suggest that handgrip strength may reflect general functional capacity rather than a PD-specific neuromuscular mechanism and support its use as a practical clinical indicator of mobility-related function.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.