SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Short-term heart rate variability is preserved in Parkinson's disease under atomoxetine.

Brain Commun · 2026-09-08

DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcag338PMID: 42741788

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Repurposed noradrenergic drugs have been proposed to treat neuropsychiatric symptoms in Parkinson's disease and related conditions. While there is evidence that these drugs can be beneficial for cognition in selected patients, questions remain about their cardiovascular effects. Here, we tested whether heart rate variability (HRV) is altered in people with Parkinson's disease, following a single-dose challenge with the noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine (40 mg, oral). Consistent with previous work, our cohort of people with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (n = 15) had lower HRV than healthy controls (n = 22). Select markers of decreased HRV in people with Parkinson's disease were associated with reduced integrity of the caudal locus coeruleus, measured using neuromelanin-sensitive ultra-high-field 7T magnetic resonance imaging. Following a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover challenge in the Parkinson's disease group, short-term resting HRV was not significantly altered following atomoxetine. Using Bayesian statistical inference, we demonstrated confidence in the preservation of HRV across measures in the time, frequency and non-linear domains. Our findings are in favour of a safe cardiovascular profile for atomoxetine in Parkinson's disease, further supporting noradrenergic modulation as a viable treatment strategy for neuropsychiatric symptoms in Parkinson's disease and related disorders.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.