Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
ObjectBipedal locomotion requires coordinated corticospinal interactions, yet how these networks dynamically reorganize across gait phases remains poorly understood. This study aimed to characterize the phase-dependent restructuring of corticospinal functional networks during rest, stance, and swing in healthy rats.MethodsSingle-unit spiking activity was simultaneously recorded from the hindlimb motor cortex and lumbar spinal cord of healthy rats across three behavioral states: Rest, stance, and swing. Granger causality analysis was applied to local field potentials (LFPs) to assess directed functional connectivity. Total Spiking Probability Edges (TSPE) algorithm was used to estimate spike-train functional connectivity. Network topology was characterized by global efficiency and rich-club coefficient.ResultsGranger causality revealed that corticospinal connectivity was most prominent in the beta band (13-35 Hz) during active locomotion. Global efficiency rose from rest (0.33) to stance (0.53) and swing (0.51). TSPE confirmed rich-club topology in all conditions. Spinal hub neurons predominated during locomotion, comprising 81.13% ± 15.5% of rich-club hubs at stance and 60.48% ± 10.21% at swing, while cortical and spinal hubs were balanced at rest. Mean latency decreased from 29.60 ± 20.66 ms at rest to 9.67 ± 1.65 ms during stance.ConclusionsThe central nervous system dynamically restructures corticospinal functional networks across gait phases, with spinal hub neurons assuming a dominant role during active locomotion. This framework provides a mechanistic reference for studying corticospinal disruptions in spinal cord injury, Parkinson's disease, and stroke, and identifies phase-specific beta-band coupling and rich-club hub dynamics as candidate targets for closed-loop neural interfaces in gait rehabilitation.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.