Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundLower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is a major cause of hospitalisation in older adults with Parkinson's disease (PD), but it remains uncertain whether PD-related measures provide clinically relevant information beyond general vulnerability and acute infection severity.MethodsWe conducted a single-centre retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥65 years with neurologist-diagnosed PD who were hospitalised for LRTI between 2018 and 2025. The primary outcome was a composite of intensive care unit admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, or in-hospital death. Documented readmission to the index hospital within 90 days among survivors was analysed as a secondary exploratory outcome. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models evaluated clinical factors associated with these outcomes. A hierarchical extension added Hoehn-Yahr stage and pre-admission wheelchair- or bed-bound status to the base clinical model. Calendar-period analyses and bootstrap internal validation were performed.ResultsAmong 246 patients, 62 (25.2%) experienced the composite in-hospital outcome. In the PD-specific extended model, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (adjusted odds ratio [OR] per 1-point increase 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.42), hypoxaemia (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.01-3.96), serum albumin ConclusionSevere in-hospital deterioration was associated mainly with general physiological vulnerability, acute infection severity, and pre-admission mobility dependence, whereas most other available PD-specific measures showed no clear independent association. These findings support integrated clinical assessment but not a validated PD-specific prediction strategy; the post-discharge analysis reflects documented return to the index hospital rather than complete population-level readmission.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.