SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Factors associated with self- perceived speech impairment in <i>de novo</i> Parkinson's disease: a retrospective study of an international database.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2026-09-18

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2026.1932141PMID: 42827767

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionPeople with Parkinson's disease (PwPD) may experience speech changes early in the disease process, yet it is unclear how they perceive them. Moreover, in de novo PD specifically, the relationship between speech, cognition, and swallowing is not well-established. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the association between self-perceived speech impairment, clinician-perceived speech impairment, cognitive impairment, and swallowing impairment in de novo PD.MethodsData were obtained from the Parkinson's Progressive Markers Initiative. We included baseline visit data from 1072 de novo PwPD. An ordinal logistic regression was performed to determine what clinical measures were associated with self-perceived speech impairment.ResultsThe ordinal logistic regression found that self-perceived speech impairments were significantly associated with clinician-perceived speech impairment (Wald χ2[3] = 44.039, p 2[3] = 61.863, p 2[4] = 32.293, p 2[1] = 11.520, p ConclusionThis preliminary work showed potential relationships between self-perceived and clinician-perceived speech impairment, swallowing impairment, and cognitive impairment, demonstrating the multidimensional nature of self-perceived speech impairment. More research using more extensive assessment methods is needed to further elucidate these relationships in de novo PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.