SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Theta-frequency subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation selectively improves visual attention in Parkinson's disease.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2026-09-18

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2026.1961905PMID: 42827938

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectiveVisual attention deficits are common but under-recognized in Parkinson's disease (PD), and we investigate whether theta-frequency (5 Hz) STN-DBS differentially modulates visual attention compared with high-frequency (130 Hz) stimulation in PD patients.MethodsThirty-nine PD patients with bilateral STN-DBS perform an attentional capture task under three stimulation conditions (OFF, low-frequency, high-frequency). Patients are stratified into impaired (n = 21) and normal (n = 18) visual attention groups based on their accuracy in the AC-distractor task during OFF-stimulation, with ResultsIn the impaired group, 5 Hz stimulation significantly improves accuracy in the distractor condition compared with OFF (BF > 1,000), whereas 130 Hz stimulation reduces accuracy (BF = 122.8). This behavioral pattern is paralleled by enhanced P300 amplitude and prolonged latency under 5 Hz stimulation, and suppressed P300 amplitude under 130 Hz stimulation. No significant stimulation effects are observed in the normal group.ConclusionTheta-frequency STN-DBS selectively improves visual attention in PD with pre-existing attentional deficits, likely by enhancing top-down attentional resource allocation, while high-frequency stimulation impairs performance.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.