Large Language Model-Based Identification of Subjective Cognitive Decline in Electronic Health Records Among Older Adults With Normal Cognitive Testing: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundSubjective cognitive decline (SCD) typically refers to self- or informant-reported decline in cognition despite the absence of objective impairment on standardized testing. Older adults with documented normal cognitive test performance provide a pragmatic anchor cohort for electronic health record (EHR)-based SCD phenotyping. However, cognitive concerns are primarily recorded in unstructured notes and are inconsistently documented, making it unclear how often and in whom concerns are captured in routine care.ObjectiveThis study aims to operationalize EHR-based SCD phenotyping in an objectively normal-testing cohort using a large language model (LLM)-based natural language processing approach and to examine the frequency and clinical and sociodemographic correlates of cognitive concern documentation.MethodsWe conducted an EHR-based observational study of patients aged 65 years or older with a first normal cognitive test recorded in EHR flowsheets between January 2019 and April 2024 in a large health care system. We developed and iteratively refined a 2-stage LLM-based natural language processing pipeline to identify documented cognitive concerns in unstructured notes during the 12 months prior to the index date, and evaluated performance against manual review. We quantified the frequency of documented concerns within this normal-testing cohort and used multivariable logistic regression to assess associations with sociodemographic factors (age, marital status, insurance, and neighborhood Area Deprivation Index), sequentially adjusting for clinical comorbidities and relevant medications.ResultsAmong 15,750 older adults with normal cognitive test scores, 13.8% (n=2175) had at least 1 documented cognitive concern in the prior year, captured in 1.2% (7394/605,177) of notes. On manual validation, the 2-stage pipeline (Med42-v2-8B screening followed by GPT-4o confirmation) achieved a sensitivity of 0.957, positive predictive value of 0.935, specificity of 0.985, and F1-score of 0.945 for cognitive concern identification. Documentation was more likely in older individuals, those with commercial (vs Medicare) insurance, and those with neurological and psychiatric conditions. In fully adjusted models, Parkinson disease (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.29, 95% CI 3.60-7.77), traumatic brain injury (aOR 4.63, 95% CI 3.15-6.81), stroke or transient ischemic attack (aOR 3.46, 95% CI 3.15-4.18), epilepsy (aOR 2.52, 95% CI 1.83-3.49), depression (aOR 1.54, 95% CI 1.36-1.75), and excessive alcohol use (aOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.06-2.06) were among the strongest correlates of cognitive concern documentation. In contrast, obesity (aOR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65-0.82), hyperlipidemia (aOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.51-0.67), and residence in more deprived neighborhoods (higher Area Deprivation Index) were associated with lower odds of documented cognitive concerns.ConclusionsA 2-stage LLM pipeline enabled accurate identification of documented cognitive concerns consistent with SCD among older adults with normal cognitive testing. Documentation was uncommon and selectively captured by clinical and sociodemographic factors, with implications for equity and the validity of EHR-based phenotypes.

Related topics