SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Gut oralisation signatures in Parkinson's disease: an integrative multi-study analysis.

J Oral Microbiol · 2026-10-11

DOI: 10.1080/20002297.2026.2737700PMID: 42866484

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundParkinson's disease (PD) compromises oral hygiene and oral health, potentially increasing oral bacterial input to the gut. Whether PD is associated with reproducible faecal enrichment of oral disease-linked taxa remains unclear.ObjectiveTo determine whether oral disease-linked taxa are enriched in the faecal microbiota of individuals with PD.MethodsWe conducted a pooled re-analysis of 23 faecal 16S rRNA datasets, comprising 3,594 PD and control samples. eHOMD was used to resolve oral-associated taxa, including caries/endodontic- and periodontitis-linked taxa. SILVA-based profiles were used to assess community diversity and ordination patterns. Differential-abundance analyses accounted for variation between studies.ResultsPD samples showed heterogeneous but reproducible enrichment of oral disease-linked taxa, with a prominent caries/endodontic-associated component. The cariogenic-enriched subgroup showed reduced evenness and increased representation of oral taxa including Streptococcus mutans. Beta-diversity analyses showed substantial PD-control overlap and an oralization-related compositional gradient rather than a discrete PD-specific cluster.ConclusionsThis pooled re-analysis identifies a gut oralization-associated signal in a subset of individuals with PD. Faecal enrichment of oral-associated taxa may represent one component of gut microbiome heterogeneity and may indirectly reflect variation in oral ecosystem status, supporting oral health assessment in future PD microbiome studies.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.