SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Progressive Supranuclear Palsy-Primary Lateral Sclerosis Overlap Syndrome in a Patient with a <i>CYLD</i> Variant.

Balkan J Med Genet · 2026-07-01

DOI: 10.2478/bjmg-2026-0005PMID: 42877817

Check source for accessJournal Article; Case ReportsOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectiveProgressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is an atypical parkinsonian syndrome characterized by progressive axial rigidity, vertical gaze palsy, dysarthria, and dysphagia. This report describes a case of PSP-primary lateral sclerosis overlap syndrome associated with a CYLD gene variant.CaseWe describe the case of a 59-year-old male patient who presented with slowing of movements and hypophonic speech. Neurological examination revealed hypomimia, dysarthric and hypophonic speech, restricted upward gaze, slow saccadic eye movements, rigidity and bradykinesia in all extremities, axial rigidity, brisk deep tendon reflexes, bilateral positive Hoffman's sign, and bilateral extensor plantar responses. Brain MRI showed the "hummingbird sign" accompanied by bilateral cortico-spinal tract hyperintensity. MEP studies showed impaired excitability and conduction in the corticomotor system. Molecular genetic analysis identified a heterozygous G107A (c.320G>A; p.Gly107Asp) missense variant in the CYLD gene.ConclusionBased on these findings, a diagnosis of PSP-Primary Lateral Sclerosis overlap syndrome was made. The contribution of the identified CYLD variant to this complex phenotype and its role in the neurodegenerative disease spectrum warrant further investigation.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.