SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

β-Cyclodextrin-Complexed 1,8-Cineole Attenuates Motor Deficits and Preserves Tyrosine Hydroxylase Immunoreactivity in a Reserpine-Induced Mouse Model of Parkinsonism.

Mol Neurobiol · 2026-10-15

DOI: 10.1007/s12035-026-06262-4PMID: 42879042

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by dopaminergic dysfunction and motor impairment. Natural compounds have emerged as promising candidates for neuroprotection and symptomatic relief in experimental models of PD. This study investigated the effects of β-cyclodextrin-complexed 1,8-cineole (CIN) in a reserpine (RES)-induced mouse model of parkinsonism. Male mice were treated with RES (0.1 mg/kg, s.c., every 48 h) and/or CIN (5 mg/kg, p.o., once daily) for 30 days. Behavioral assessments evaluated motor, sensorimotor, and locomotor function. Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and α-synuclein immunoreactivity were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Repeated RES administration induced progressive motor and sensorimotor impairments and reduced TH immunoreactivity in mesencephalic dopaminergic nuclei. CIN treatment significantly reduced catalepsy, vacuous chewing movements, and chin tremors and improved sensorimotor performance in the adhesive removal test. These behavioral effects were accompanied by preservation of TH immunoreactivity in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) and ventral tegmental area (VTA). However, CIN did not significantly alter hippocampal α-synuclein immunoreactivity. These findings indicate that β-cyclodextrin-complexed CIN attenuates motor and sensorimotor deficits and is associated with preservation of dopaminergic markers in a RES-induced mouse model of parkinsonism. These results support further investigation of CIN as a neuroactive compound in experimental models of PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.