Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Background: /Objectives: We investigated the potential protective effect of dietary curcumin in curry meals against the risk of cognitive decline and incident neurocognitive disorder (mild cognitive impairment and dementia) in the population-based Singapore Longitudinal Ageing cohort study. Methods: Curry consumption was categorised as ‘never or rarely’, ‘occasionally’: <once/month, ‘often’: >once/month to <once/week, ‘very often’: >once/week, or ‘daily’. Among 2920 participants (mean age 65.5 ± SD 7.1) who were free of stroke, Parkinson disease, or traumatic brain injury at baseline, cognitive decline (MMSE drop ≥2) was assessed at 3-5 year (mean 4.5) follow up. Risk of incident MCI or dementia was assessed at follow up among 2446 participants who were free of MCI and dementia at baseline. Results: Higher levels of curry consumption were associated with a decreasing linear trend of cognitive decline (p=0.037). Controlling for baseline confounders, OR relative to ‘never or rare’ consumption decreased from 0.73 for occasional consumption to 0.66 for daily consumption (p linear trend=0.15); the OR for ‘often’ consuming curry was 0.68, 95%CI=0.48-0.95. The cumulated incidence of MCI-dementia decreased from 13.1% in those who never or rarely consumed curry to 3.6% in those who daily consumed curry (linear p<0.001). The adjusted OR across levels of curry consumption showed a significant linear trend (p=0.021) from OR=0.61 (p<0.05) for occasional consumption to OR=0.21 (p<0.001) for daily consumption. Conclusions: Dietary curcumin through curry consumption is associated with a dose-dependent decrease in incidence of cognitive decline and MCI-dementia in this Asian population of community-dwelling older adults.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.