Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Abstract Background: Qualitative research offers unique insights into the lived experience of individuals with chronic conditions which can tie directly into public health priorities and identifying the need for additional support. More participatory approaches and qualitative data surrounding chronic diseases are needed in sub-Saharan Africa. Valuable “insider” insights are often missing as the conceptualisation of research often overlooks the value of such interactions. For successful and meaningful global health research, it is imperative to involve in-country experts and strengthen the capacity of research teams with qualitative skills. Methods: To address this, two hybrid qualitative research skills workshops were conducted in West Africa (Ghana; with virtual attendees from Nigeria) and East Africa (Kenya; with virtual attendees from Tanzania and Ethiopia) to deliver training and develop support networks as part of the ‘Transforming Parkinson’s Care in Africa’ research project. Both workshops were conducted for two days and involved presentations, discussions, and activities to ensure attendee interaction, while providing a comprehensive overview of qualitative research. Results: 58 healthcare professionals and researchers attended the training. Following the training, improvement was noted in self-rated knowledge and skills, with positive feedback from attendees. To ensure a lasting impact of the training, a community of practice has been established to provide continual support and mentorship to attendees. Five qualitative software licenses were also purchased for use by attendees. Conclusions: To continue these learnings forward, a community of practice is being formed to ensure the long-term impact of this training, with the ultimate goal of improving the public health workforce across SSA. This is enacted through continual engagement and mentorship of workshop attendees and addressing financial barriers to success by funding software access for individuals.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.