SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Simultaneous Detection and Quantification of Age-Dependent Dopamine Release

· 2025-07-29

DOI: 10.20944/preprints202507.2410.v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Dopamine (DA) is a key biomarker for neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s. However, detailed insights into how DA release in the brain changes with aging remain challenging. This study presents a machine learning framework to automatically detect and quantify dopamine (DA) release using the near-infrared catecholamine nanosensors (nIRCats) dataset of acute mouse brain tissue across three age groups (4, 8.5, and 12 weeks), focusing on the dorsolateral (DLS) and dorsomedial striatum (DMS). 251 image frames from the dataset were analyzed to extract features for training a CatBoost regression model. The model achieved validation Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 0.004 and R² value of 0.79. When the acceptable prediction range was expanded to include values within ±10% of the actual DA release and mouse age, model performance improved to a validation MSE of 0.001 and R² value of 0.97. To enhance speed while maintaining much of the predictive accuracy, the model was distilled into a kernelized Ridge regression model. These results demonstrate that the proposed approach can accurately and automatically predict spatial and age-dependent dopamine dynamics; a crucial requirement for optimizing deep brain stimulation therapies for neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s disease (PD) and depression.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.