SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Association Between Upper Respiratory Tract Infections and Parkinson’s Disease in Korean Populations: A Nested Case-Control Study Using a National Health Screening Cohort

· 2025-07-31

DOI: 10.20944/preprints202507.2642.v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Although epidemiological studies have suggested associations between infections and Parkinson’s disease (PD), only few have explored the relationship between upper respiratory tract infections (URIs) and PD, apart from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study investigated whether a history of URI was associated with PD diagnosis in Korean individuals aged ≥40 years using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service National Sample Cohort. A total of 5,844 patients with PD were identified and matched with 23,376 control participants at a 1:4 ratio based on age, sex, income, and geographical region. Multiple logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between URI history and PD, adjusting for smoking status, alcohol consumption, obesity, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol, and comorbidity scores. Individuals with URI history within 1 year (≥1, ≥2, or ≥3 episodes) had significantly lower odds of PD diagnosis than matched controls (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88–0.97, aOR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.87–0.96 and aOR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87–0.98, respectively). No significant association was observed for URI history within 2 years. These findings suggest a potential inverse relationship between recent URI and PD development, warranting further investigation into underlying mechanisms.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.