SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

DEER of Singly Labelled Proteins to Evaluate Supramolecular Packing of Amyloid Fibrils

· 2025-11-12

DOI: 10.1101/2025.11.10.687719

Open accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

1 The formation of protein amyloid fibrils in the brain is a hallmark of various neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer diseases and Parkinson diseases. Amyloid fibrils are highly ordered aggregates in which proteins folded in two-dimensional layers stack along one axis to form elongated linear assemblies. The specific conformations adopted by the proteins within each layer of the amyloid correlates with the pathology. Furthermore, their spreading and templating competency relies on strict in register packing of the folded proteins along the fibril growing axis. There is a need for tools to characterize not only the protein fold across the fibril cross section but also the spatial ordering of the proteins stacked along the amyloid fibril axis. We present an approach based on double electron electron resonance spectroscopy (DEER) using singly labelled tau protein assembled in amyloid fibrils that can deliver an apparent dimensionality of the supramolecular organization of tau fibrils. The parameters of the DEER background function can be used to assess the amyloid core location and packing order, and track time-resolved formation of aggregation intermediates. Showcasing the method on tau, we demonstrate that heparin-induced tau fibrils are mispacked while seeded aggregation can template amyloid fibrils with a higher packing order. This study benchmarks a new method that will provide critical structural insights into amyloid assemblies. Abstract Figure DEER-derived dimensionality parameter differentiates between spin-labelled tau protein in solution, in perfectly aligned fibril or in imperfectly aligned fibril (fibril structure edited from PDB 6qjh).

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.