SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Neuroprotective Effects of Gallic Acid in an MPP⁺-Induced SH-SY5Y Cell Model of Parkinson’s Disease

· 2026-01-29

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8653441/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Background Parkinson’s Disease (PD) represents the second most prevalent neurodegenerative condition which leads to the progressive destruction of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra through oxidative stress mechanisms. The research evaluated Gallic Acid (GA) as a natural polyphenol with proven antioxidant properties for its ability to protect cells from 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP⁺)-induced neurotoxicity in SH-SY5Y dopaminergic cell models. Methods and Results The research used SH-SY5Y cells which received 1 mM MPP⁺ treatment alongside different GA concentrations (25,50 and 100 µM) for 24 and 48 hours. The CCK-8 assay measured cell viability while flow cytometry evaluated apoptosis and SOD and MDA levels determined oxidative status through SOD and Catalase and NO measurements. The addition of MPP⁺ resulted in a 32.74% decrease in cell viability at 48 hours while simultaneously decreasing SOD and Catalase and NO levels and increasing MDA levels. The addition of 25 µM GA protected cells from damage by increasing their viability to 86.53% at 48 hours and decreasing apoptotic cell numbers. The protective effects of 25–50 µM GA were observed through its ability to stop Catalase and NO decreases and its successful reduction of MDA levels (GA 25 µM decreased MDA from 21.18 to 9.64 nM/mg prot at 48 hours). The research indicates that GA functions as an antioxidant by rebuilding the body's natural defense system against oxidative stress. Conclusions The study demonstrates that GA provides strong protection against peroxidation by maintaining essential antioxidant enzyme activities in MPP⁺-exposed cells. The research demonstrates that GA shows potential as an effective

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.