SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

VEGFA Gene Expression Levels in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease and First-Degree Relatives

· 2026-03-19

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8433576/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) contributes to angiogenesis and exerts neurotrophic and neuroprotective effects. Altered VEGFA expression has been implicated in neurodegenerative processes, including Parkinson´s disease (PD), yet findings from peripheral transcriptomic studies remain inconsistent. Data on individuals at increased risk, particularly first-degree relatives (FDRs), are limited. Objective: To evaluate peripheral blood VEGFA mRNA expression in patients with PD and their asymptomatic FDRs compared with healthy controls, and to assess age-related patterns and diagnostic performance. Methods: Peripheral blood VEGFA expression was analyzed in 123 participants (PD patients, FDRs, healthy controls) using one-step RT-qPCR normalized to B2M . Relative expression values were log-transformed (logVEGFA). Group differences, age correlations, and diagnostic discrimination were assessed using ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Both PD patients and FDRs showed significantly higher logVEGFA levels than healthy controls (p = 0.004), with the most pronounced differences observed in participants aged ≤ 60 years (p Conclusions: Peripheral VEGFA expression is elevated in both PD patients and FDRs, particularly in younger individuals. Age-stratified VEGFA assessment may support early identification of individuals at risk of PD and complement existing prodromal biomarkers, pending longitudinal validation.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.