SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Inflammatory Protein Landscape in the CSF of Mid- to Late- Stage Parkinson’s Disease: Associations with Motor Severity and Subtypes

· 2026-03-24

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9090757/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Purpose: Parkinson’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder in which neuroinflammation is recognized as a contributor to clinical progression. This study aimed to characterize the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) inflammatory profile in mid- to late-stage PD patients and identify specific inflammatory proteins with potential clinical relevance to motor symptoms and disease severity. Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, CSF samples were obtained from 25 patients with mid-to late- stage PD (mean disease duration: 10.24 ± 4.65 years) and 15 non-PD controls. The levels of 92 inflammation-related proteins were quantified using the Olink proximity extension assay (PEA). Based on the identified differentially expressed proteins (DEPs), we next compared inflammatory profiles between the postural instability and gait difficulty (PIGD, n = 10) and tremor-dominant (TD, n = 10) PD subtypes. Additionally, correlation analyses were performed between the DEPs and Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS-III) scores to identify inflammatory biomarkers with potential clinical relevance. Results: Using the Olink platform, 28 DEPs were identified between the PD and non-PD groups ( p p p = 0.028), CD8A (r = 0.414, p = 0.039), and CXCL9 (r = 0.414, p = 0.040) showed the strongest correlations with UPDRS-III scores. Conclusion: This study identifies IFN-γ as the central hub protein within the CSF inflammatory network in mid- to late-stage PD and highlights specific T cell-related DEPs that are strongly associated with motor dysfunction. These proteins may represent potential targets for future anti-inflammatory therapies and serve as biomarkers for tracking disease progression.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.