SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Modeling <i>cis</i> -regulatory variation in human brain enhancers across a large Parkinson’s Disease cohort

· 2026-03-19

DOI: 10.64898/2026.03.15.711881

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have linked more than a hundred non-coding genomic loci to Parkinson’s disease (PD) risk. Deciphering their functional impact on gene regulation requires cell type-aware modeling approaches to assess the effects of sequence variation on enhancer function and target gene expression. To address this challenge, we generated a comprehensive matched dataset from 190 human donors (115 controls and 75 PD), comprising long-read whole-genome sequencing alongside single nucleus multiome atlases (snATAC-seq and snRNA-seq for 3.1 and 1.1 million nuclei respectively) of the anterior cingulate cortex and substantia nigra. By integrating chromatin accessibility quantitative trait loci (caQTL), DNA methylation QTL (meQTL), and allele-specific chromatin accessibility (ASCA), we identified 53,841 high-confidence cis -acting genetic variants that modulate cell type-specific enhancer accessibility in one or both brain regions. We further demonstrate that sequence-to-function models can accurately predict the impact of these variants directly from the genomic sequence. Novel explainability approaches allowed stratifying these variants according to their regulatory function, with the majority disrupting specific transcription factor binding sites in a cell type specific manner. Integrating these “enhancer variants” (EV) with eQTL mapping and gene locus modeling linked a subset of EVs to their target genes. Finally, we applied these models to prioritize regulatory variants at known PD GWAS loci, bypassing statistical limitations in rare disease-relevant populations like dopaminergic neurons. All together, we establish a unique resource and new sequence modeling strategies to interpret functional non-coding variation in the human brain.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.