Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Abnormal beta-band activity (13-30 Hz) within the cortico-basal ganglia network is a hallmark of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and is closely linked to motor impairment. Pathological beta activity in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) occurs predominantly as brief, high-amplitude bursts rather than continuous oscillations. Although beta-band coherence between the STN and cortex increases during bursts, it remains unclear whether cortico-STN beta coupling persists outside these bursts. Using intraoperative STN local field potentials and simultaneous cortical electrocorticography from seven patients undergoing deep brain stimulation implantation surgery, cortico-STN beta coupling during burst and non-burst epochs was compared. Coupling was assessed using magnitude-squared coherence and the debiased weighted phase lag index (dwPLI) and compared against surrogate distributions generated by circular time-shifting. Both coupling metrics were significantly elevated during burst epochs relative to non-burst periods. During non-burst epochs, coupling collapsed to surrogate levels, indicating no evidence of sustained synchronization. Time-resolved analyses further demonstrated that elevated coupling was confined to burst epochs. Although a subset of motor cortical contacts exhibited elevated baseline coherence, coupling was less evident using dwPLI. These findings suggest that pathological cortico-STN beta coupling in PD is preferentially expressed during beta bursts rather than sustained across non-burst epochs, with implications for adaptive neuromodulation strategies.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.