SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Wearable Gait Biomarkers and Explainable AI Identify High Prodromal Burden in Parkinson’s Disease

· 2026-05-20

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8482877/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Identifying Parkinson’s disease (PD) during its prodromal, non-motor phase remains a barrier to early intervention. Gait impairment represents one of the most disabling and clinically informative manifestations of PD. Subtle and sub-clinical gait impairments may occur during the prodromal phase, being potentially useful for early PD identification. This study developed an interpretable machine-learning framework using wearable inertial gait data to model and quantify high prodromal burden in PD, defined as the anamnestic presence of at least three prodromal symptoms. A total of 275 individuals with PD performed 30-m walking trials using a single lumbar inertial sensor. Thirty-five biomechanical and clinical variables were extracted, and feature selection identified five key predictors: multiscale entropy (MSE) along three axes, vertical improved harmonic ratio (iHRv), and body weight. A Random Forest classifier balanced through Conditional Tabular Generative Adversarial Network (CTGAN) augmentation achieved robust performance (ROCAUC = 0.84, PRAUC = 0.86, F1score = 0.76). Explainability analyses highlighted that increased MSE and reduced iHRv were the strongest contributors to high prodromal burden, indicating elevated gait complexity and altered spatio-temporal symmetry. These findings delineate a gait phenotype associated with prodromal burden in PD, providing mechanistic insight into early disease-related motor alterations.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.