SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning for Cross-Dataset EEG-Based Detection of Parkinson's Disease

· 2026-06-17

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9836024/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Early and accurate detection of Parkinson’s disease (PD) is critical for timely clinical intervention. Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals serve as promising non-invasive biomarkers for PD; however, challenges such as data privacy, limited sample sizes, and inter-institutional heterogeneity in signal acquisition remain significant barriers to robust model development. To address these issues, we propose a federated learning (FL) framework that enables decentralized EEG classification, facilitating collaborative training without exchanging sensitive raw data. EEG recordings from three publicly available datasets were transformed into three-channel time–frequency representations (TFRs) via the continuous wavelet transform (CWT) and processed using a ResNet18 backbone augmented with squeeze-and-excitation (SE) modules to enhance spatiotemporal feature extraction. Model performance was rigorously validated using subject-level Monte Carlo cross-validation (MCCV) with five independent random splits. The FL framework consistently outperformed conventional centralized training across all datasets. Under the frontal–central–occipital electrode configuration, the model achieved up to 96.67% accuracy, 93.33% sensitivity, 100.00% specificity, 100.00% precision, and 96.00% F1-score at the subject level. These findings demonstrate that the proposed framework provides an effective, scalable, and privacy-preserving solution for PD diagnostics, significantly advancing the potential for robust, multi-center clinical deployment.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.