Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Abstract Levodopa is the most effective symptomatic treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD), yet whether it returns the brain toward health or reorganizes it into a new state is unresolved. We traced the acute levodopa response across scales in 34 patients (resting-state functional MRI, OFF and ON) versus 36 matched controls, following it from local activity (amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations and regional homogeneity), through the whole-brain connectome (network-based statistics, brain–behaviour coupling), to its molecular (ten neurotransmitter PET atlases) and transcriptomic (Allen Human Brain Atlas) context, with individual response estimated by connectome-based predictive modelling. At no scale did levodopa move the brain toward the control pattern. A right prefrontal abnormality persisted regardless of medication, whereas a distributed treated-state subnetwork of hyperconnectivity emerged only ON medication (387 edges; family-wise error p = 0.034; reproduced under stricter motion control). Its magnitude predicted improvement in the dopamine-responsive signs, most consistently bradykinesia (leave-one-out r = 0.30, including under fully nested cross-validation), but not the dopamine-resistant tremor or axial signs. Treated-state activity spatially aligned with dopaminergic and serotonergic systems, and the behaviourally coupled network co-localized with mitochondrial energy-metabolism genes. Acute levodopa therefore reorganizes rather than repairs the Parkinsonian brain in a way that tracks individual motor benefit.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.