SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

In Silico Characterization of Desmodium gangeticum Compounds as Dual Modulators of MAO-B and 5- HT2A in Parkinson’s Disease: An Integrated Approach Combining Molecular Docking, ADMET Profiling, MM-GBSA, QSAR Modeling, and Molecular Dynamics Simulation

· 2026-07-10

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10242302/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Management of Parkinson's disease (PD) is challenging: dopaminergic treatments alleviate motor symptoms but exacerbate psychosis, while antipsychotics alleviate hallucinations but exacerbate motor symptoms. To tackle this problem, we combined the in-silico profiling of Desmodium gangeticum's phytochemicals with dual monoamine oxidase‑B (MAO‑B) and 5‑hydroxytryptamine type 2A (5‑HT2A) modulating activity. Docking studies suggested Desmodin and 5,7,2′,4′‑Tetrahydroxy‑6‑prenylisoflavanone as potential MAO‑B modulators and N, N‑Dimethyltryptamine and Tryptamine as 5‑HT2A modulators. ADMET profiling revealed promising central nervous system (CNS) drug-likeness, adequate blood-brain barrier penetration and tolerability. Toxicity prediction showed non-toxicity towards hepatotoxicity, mutagenicity and carcinogenicity. MM-GBSA calculations and molecular dynamics studies supported strong interactions and AutoQSAR indicated bioactivity. Thus, these findings indicate that metabolites of D. gangeticum are potentially effective bi-therapy molecules to treat the motor and neuropsychiatric symptoms of PD. These phytochemicals need experimental research to advance their development as safer and multi‑targeted drug candidates for clinical trials.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.