SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

MOLECULAR BASIS FOR PINK1 MATURATION

· 2026-08-23

DOI: 10.64898/2026.08.19.745883

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ABSTRACT Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-induced putative kinase 1 (PINK1), a key regulator of mitophagy, has been linked to the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease (PD). PINK1 recruits Parkin, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, triggering mitophagy in response to mitochondrial damage. During mitophagy, the quantity, stability, and activity of PINK1 must be strictly regulated; however, the mechanisms governing these parameters under cellular stress are still unclear. Herein, we determined the structural basis for PINK1 maturation mediated by heat shock protein 90alpha/cell division cycle 37/FK506-binding protein 51 (HSP90α/CDC37/FKBP51) chaperone complex. We identified PINK1-associated proteins using liquid chromatography– tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and determined the structures of the complexes using Cryo-Electron Microscopy (Cryo-EM). Results showed that FKBP51 potentially interacts with a conserved leucine–proline–phenylalanine (LPF) motif on the activation loop of PINK1 and negatively regulates PINK1 functions in mitophagy. A PINK1 mutation located at the FKBP51 recognition site is linked to mitophagy deficiency, which can be partially rescued by specific inhibition of FKBP51. These findings reveal a general mechanism for PINK1 recognition by the HSP90α/CDC37/FKBP51 chaperone complex and suggest a potential approach for upregulating PINK1 activity, which is impaired in PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.