SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Evaluate the correlation of electrolytes with biochemical parameters in biological samples of Parkinson’s disease patients at different stages

· 2020-04-24

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-22404/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Background: Neurodegeneration is complex and multifaceted leading to many chronic diseases like Parkinson’s disorder. Electrolytes imbalance have significant role in the pathophysiology of neurological disorders, which might be serve as a bio-indicator of the neurological problems. In present study, the disturbances of electrolytes (calcium, magnesium, sodium and potassium) and its correlation with biochemical parameters in patients with Parkinson’s at different stages with related to referent were studied. Methods: The biological samples were collected from patients recently diagnosed for mild Parkinson disease (MPD) (n=95) as well as chronic PD (CPD) patients, diagnosed for last 5 to 10 years (n=125).The Precision of digestion method was verified by applying matrixes matched certified reference materials of biological samples. The recovery of electrolytes was obtained in the range of 98.4–99.1 % of certified reference materials. The electrolytes concentrations were measured by acid digested biological samples preliminary analysis through flame atomic absorption spectrometry. Results: The experimental data indicated the content of Calcium and Magnesium were found to be higher in scalp hair samples of both patients while Sodium and Potassium showed inverse relation (pConclusions: These results suggest a disturbance in the elemental homeostasis during the diseases of PD at different stages. In spite of, additional work is proposed to study the actual correlation among micro elemental level and the grade of diseases in neurological sick person.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.