SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Pharmacological Antagonism of Kainate Receptor Rescues Dysfunction and Loss of Dopamine Neurons in a Mouse Model of Human Parkin-induced Toxicity

· 2020-06-24

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-36149/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract BackgroundMutations in the PARK2 gene encoding the protein parkin cause autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism (ARJP), a neurodegenerative disease characterized by dysfunction and death of dopamine (DA) neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. Since a neuroprotective therapy for ARJP does not exist, research efforts aimed at discovering potential targets for neuroprotection are critically needed.A previous study demonstrated that loss of parkin function or expression of parkin mutants associated with ARJP causesan accumulation of glutamate kainate receptors (KARs) in human brain tissues and an increase of KAR-mediated currents in neuronsin vitro. MethodsBased on the hypothesisthat such KAR hyper-activation may contribute to the death of nigralDA neurons, we investigated the effect of KAR antagonism on the DA neuron dysfunction and death that occur in the parkinQ311X mouse, a model of human parkin-induced toxicity. ResultsWe found that early accumulation of KARs occurs in the DA neurons of the parkinQ311X mouse model and that chronic administration of the KAR antagonist UBP310 prevents DA neuron loss. This neuroprotective effect was associated with rescue of the abnormal firing rate of nigral DA neurons and downregulation of GluK2, the key KAR subunit. ConclusionsThis study provides novel evidence ofa causal role of glutamate KARs in the DA neuron dysfunction and loss occurring in a mouse model of human parkin-induced toxicity. Our results support KAR as a potential target in the development of a neuroprotective therapy for ARJP.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.