Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Background: Parkinson's disease is characterized by abnormal synaptic transmission in the corticostriatal circuit that leads to deficits in motor abilities. Electro-acupuncture has shown to improve the motor behaviors in parkinsonian models. However, the potential mechanisms underlying the electro-acupuncture treatment, specifically in the partial-lesioned model, remain unclear. Methods By utilizing multiple approaches, including electrophysiological, immunohistochemistrical, molecular and behavioral methods, we assessed the effect of electro-acupuncture on the motor dysfunction and striatal synaptic plasticity in a partial-lesioned mouse model induced by intrastriatal injection of 6-hydroxydopamine. Results Electro-acupuncture ameliorated the disrupted gross and fine motor skills in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned mice. Notably, electro-acupuncture not only restored the injured corticostriatal long-term potentiation, but also reversed the loss of GluN1-containing NMDA receptors and GluA1-containing AMPA receptors in the striatum. Furthermore, the antagonists selective for AMPA receptors and NMDA receptors blocked the effect of electro-acupuncture on the corticostriatal long-term potentiation in 6-hydroxydopamine-treated mice. Conclusions These data suggest that the postsynaptic glutamate receptors in the striatum undergo the maladaptive changes in the early stage of Parkinson's disease. Electro-acupuncture improves the motor skills via a mechanism involving the modulation of corticostriatal synaptic plasticity and specific glutamate receptors in a partial-lesioned rodent model.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.