SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Piperazine-Substituted Chalcones: A New Class of MAO-B, AChE, and BACE-1 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Neurologic Al Disorders

· 2021-02-05

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-158102/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Eleven piperazine-containing 1,3-diphenylprop-2-en-1-one derivatives (PC1-PC11) were evaluated for their inhibitory activities against monoamine oxidases (MAOs), cholinesterases (ChEs), and β-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE-1) with a view toward developing new treatments for neurological disorders. Compounds PC10 and PC11 remarkably inhibited MAO-B inhibition with IC50 values of 0.65 and 0.71 µM, respectively. Ten of the eleven compounds weakly inhibited AChE and BChE with > 50% of residual activities at 10 µM, although PC4 inhibited AChE by 56.6% (IC50 = 8.77 µM). Compound PC3 effectively inhibited BACE-1 (IC50 = 6.72 µM), and PC10 and PC11 moderately inhibited BACE-1 (IC50 =14.9 and 15.3 µM, respectively). Reversibility and kinetic studies showed that PC10 and PC11 were reversible and competitive inhibitors of MAO-B with Ki values of 0.63 ± 0.13 and 0.53 ± 0.068 µM, respectively. ADME predictions for lead compounds revealed that PC10 and PC11 have central nervous system (CNS) drug-likeness. Molecular docking simulations showed that fluorine atom and trifluoromethyl group on PC10 and PC11, respectively, interacted with the substrate cavity of the MAO-B active site. Our results suggested that PC10 and PC11 be considered potential candidates for the treatment of neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.