SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

VPS35 Protects Against TMEM230-Mutation-Induced Progressive Locomotor Deficits in Drosophila

· 2021-10-26

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-952504/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract BackgroundRecently, four Parkinson’s disease (PD)-linked mutations (Y92C, R141L, 184PGext*5 and 184Wext*5) in transmembrane protein 230 (TMEM230) were identified in PD patients, and these mutations have implications in protein trafficking and neurodegeneration. However, there is a lack of in vivo studies on the roles of PD-related variants of TMEM230 in PD pathogenesis.MethodsIn this study, we generated human wild-type (WT) and mutant TMEM230 (Y92C, R141L, 184PGext*5 and 184Wext*5) transgenic Drosophila using isoform Ⅱ cDNA. ResultsWe found that the expression of TMEM230 184PGext*5 in pan-neurons or dopaminergic neurons in Drosophila induced PD-like phenotypes, which included impaired locomotor ability, a shortened lifespan, reduced TH levels, and increased phosphorylated JNK and cleaved caspase-3 levels. Moreover, rotenone, a common pesticide, enhanced TMEM230-184PGext*5-induced PD-like phenotypes. In contrast, the overexpression of wild-type (WT) VPS35 rescued TMEM230-184PGext*5-induced PD-like phenotypes, while the knockdown of VPS35 by RNA interference (RNAi) or the expression of mutant VPS35 D620N worsened PD-like phenotypes. ConclusionThese results indicate that VPS35, as a downstream effector of TMEM230, plays a critical role in TMEM230-linked JNK/caspase-3 signalling pathways and that mutations in TMEM230 and VPS35 disrupt these pathways, resulting in dopaminergic neurodegeneration and PD-like phenotypes. These findings provide novel insight into the molecular mechanisms of mutant TME230- and VPS35-induced abnormalities underlying the pathogenesis of PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.