SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Toward a Biomarker Panel measured in CNS-originating Extracellular Vesicles for Improved Differential Diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease and Multiple System Atrophy

· 2022-12-27

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2375640/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Synucleinopathies are neurodegenerative diseases characterized by accumulation of misfolded α-synuclein (α-syn) inclusions in neuronal and/or glial cells. Different synucleinopathies may affect different brain regions and cell types. In Parkinson’s disease (PD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), α-syn deposits predominantly in neuronal Lewy bodies (LBs) and Lewy neurites (LNs), whereas in multiple system atrophy (MSA), α-syn-rich glial cytoplasmic inclusions (GCIs) are found in oligodendrocytes (1). Despite differences in the underlying pathophysiology, synucleinopathies often are misdiagnosed, especially by non-experts in the early-stages, due to the overlapping clinical symptoms (2, 3). Several studies have demonstrated the utility of measuring α-syn in neuronal EVs (nEVs) as a diagnostic biomarker for PD and atypical parkinsonian disorders (4). Recently, our group has shown that α-syn measured in both nEVs and oligodendroglial EVs (oEVs) in the same samples, and in particular the oEV:nEV α-syn concentration ratio, yielded a discriminative model distinguishing between PD and MSA with 89.8% sensitivity and 86.0% specificity and between healthy controls (HC) and MSA with 96.0% sensitivity and 84.3% specificity. In contrast, the model offered moderate separation between PD and HC – 71.4% sensitivity and 62.7% specificity (5).

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.