Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Abstract Purpose Hyperadrenergic orthostatic hypotension is a subtype of orthostatic hypotension associated with elevated norepinephrine levels upon standing. Our previous study found that this subtype is characterized by less severe autonomic impairment compared to orthostatic hypotension with normal or low norepinephrine levels. However, long-term outcomes have not been determined. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the all-cause mortality and phenoconversion over 7 years. Methods In this prospective observational study, 92 patients with orthostatic hypotension were recruited from the Vanderbilt Autonomic Dysfunction Center. 34 patients with upright norepinephrine levels above 600 pg/mL were included in the hyperadrenergic cohort and 58 composed the orthostatic hypotension cohort. Both cohorts were followed for 7 years while assessing all-cause mortality and phenoconversion to neurodegenerative autonomic disorders. Results Hyperadrenergic patients showed an exaggerated orthostatic increase in norepinephrine to 938 ± 305 pg/mL upon head up tilt despite presenting with impaired autonomic reflexes. The 7-year mortality rate was 35% in the hyperadrenergic cohort compared to 22% in orthostatic hypotension (p = 0.01). The hyperadrenergic cohort had a greater phenoconversion rate to multiple system atrophy (p = 0.04), whereas the orthostatic hypotension cohort had greater phenoconversion to Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. Conclusions Despite having less severe autonomic impairment, our data suggests that hyperadrenergic orthostatic hypotension has worse clinical outcomes than neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. Patients with hyperadrenergic orthostatic hypotension require careful monitoring, given that this condition may be associated with negative outcomes.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.