SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

The use of the Voice trainer app for vocal control in people with a degenerative ataxia: a pilot intervention study.

· 2023-09-18

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3344307/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background: Dysarthria is disabling in persons with degenerative ataxia. There is limited evidence for speech therapy interventions. In this pilot study, we used the Voice trainer app, which was originally developed for patients with Parkinson’s disease, as a feedback tool for vocal control. We hypothesized that patients with ataxic dysarthria would benefit from the Voice trainer app to better control their loudness and pitch, resulting in a lower speaking rate and better intelligibility. Methods: This intervention study consisted of 5 therapy sessions of 30 minutes within 3 weeks using the principles of the Pitch Limiting Voice Treatment. Patients received real time visual feedback on loudness and pitch during the exercises. Besides, they were encouraged to practice at home or to use the Voice trainer in daily life. We used observer-rated and patient-rated outcome measures. The primary outcome measure was intelligibility, as measured by the Dutch sentence intelligibility test. Results: Twenty-one out of 25 included patients with degenerative ataxia completed the therapy. We found no statistical significant improvements in intelligibility (p = .56). However, after the intervention patients were speaking slower (p = .03) and the pause durations were longer (p Discussion: At group level we found no evidence for an effect of the Voice trainer app on intelligibility in degenerative ataxia. Because of the heterogeneity of ataxic dysarthria, a more tailor made rather than generic intervention seems warranted.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.