SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Comprehensive analyses identify IRF8 in microglia as a possible regulatory target for Parkinson’s Disease

· 2023-10-10

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3412881/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a widespread degenerative disorder of the central nervous system. The gradual degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra region is one of the primary pathological features of PD. Glial cells in SN are also linked to the pathological PD alterations. To discern the role of neurons and glial cells as well as their corresponding genetic modifications in PD, we utilized diverse bioinformatics techniques and performed biological experiments on cell and animal models. Several transcriptome datasets of the substantia nigra region were collected from the Gene Expression Omnibus dataset. Cibersort was used to deconvolute the data into proportions of brain cell types. WGCNA was used to analyze the association between modules and traits. Machine learning was used to select the hub genes from WGCNA results. Based on the results of transcriptome analysis, microglia were the most related cell type and IRF8 was identified as the hub gene associated with PD and microglia. Furthermore, an increased ratio of Irf8+ microglia was observed in PD mice, along with an elevated expression of Irf8 in primary microglia cultures treated with a-synuclein preformed fibril (PFFs). In conclusion, our research indicated IRF8 may be involved in the functional regulation of microglia in PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.