SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Dysfunctional dorsal raphe dopaminergic neurons and locus coeruleus noradrenergic neurons cause anxiety and depression in a Parkinson’s disease mouse model

· 2023-10-13

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3407836/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Parkinson's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder whose symptoms appear in a longitudinal temporal pattern along the neuropathological burden. Before motor impairment, most patients suffer anxiety/depression, the most common and disabling emotional comorbidities. The anatomical and functional bases of these comorbidities are not well established, though some studies find that the dorsal raphe (DRN) and locus coeruleus (LC) nuclei are affected by Lewy pathology at early stages of the disease when affective symptoms appear. To establish the involvement of the DRN and LC in anxiety/depression, we use a progressive mouse model that accumulates pathological human alpha-synuclein under the TH promoter in dopaminergic and noradrenergic neurons. Molecular, neurophysiological, and behavioral investigations show that such accumulation in DRN dopaminergic neurons and LC noradrenergic neurons progressively alters neuronal integrity and catecholamine signaling in the target areas, the bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST) and central amygdala (CeA). The onset of these neuronal and circuit dysfunctions is directly linked to the appearance of anxiety and depression-like behaviors in this model that recapitulate the emotional symptoms present at the early stages of Parkinson’s disease.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.