SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Oral Microbiota and Porphyromonas Gingivalis Kgp Genotypes Altered in Parkinson’s Disease with Mild Cognitive Impairment

· 2023-11-16

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3590898/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Cognitive impairment (CI) is a common complication of the non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease (PD), including PD with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) and PD dementia. Recent studies reported the oral dysbiosis in PD and CI, respectively. Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis), a pathogen of oral dysbiosis, play an important role in PD, whose lysine-gingipain (Kgp) could lead to AD-type pathologies. No previous study investigated the composition of oral microbiota and role of P. gingivalisin PD-MCI. This study aimed to investigates the differences of oral microbiota composition, P. gingivalis copy number, and Kgp genotypes among PD-MCI, PD with normal cognition(PD-NC) and periodontal status-matched control (PC) groups. The oral bacteria composition, the copy number of P. gingivalisand the Kgp genotypes in gingival crevicular fluid from PD-MCI, PD-NC, and PC were analyzed using 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing, quantitative real-time PCR, and MseⅠ restriction. We found that the structures of oral microbiota in PD-MCI group were significantly different compared to that in PD-NC and PC group. The relative abundances of Prevotella, Lactobacillus, Megasphaera, Atopobium and Howardella were negatively correlated with cognitive score. Moreover, there was a significant difference of Kgp genotypes among the three groups. The predominant Kgp genotypes of P. gingivalis in the PD-MCI group was primarily Kgp Ⅱ, whereas in the PD-NC group was mainly Kgp Ⅰ. The Kgp Ⅱ correlated with lower MMSE and MoCA scores, suggested that PD-CI may be related to Kgp genotypes Ⅱ.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.