SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Functional and Postoperative Outcomes in Ileal Pouch- Anal Anastomosis in Patients with a Neurological Disease

· 2024-07-17

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4624661/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Introduction Patients with multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease may experience pelvic floor dysfunction and constipation which can affect ileoanal pouch emptying. This can lead to complications such as pouchitis, pouch dysfunction, and failure. We hypothesized that patients with neurological diseases have a higher rate of pouch failure and complications than healthy controls. Methods Data were sourced from the institutional ileoanal pouch database. Patients with multiple sclerosis or Parkinson's disease, diagnosed before or after pouch construction, were matched to a control group of patients without neurological disease using propensity score-optimal matching. Demographics, postoperative and functional outcomes, and quality of life were analyzed. Results Twenty-six patients (38%) with multiple sclerosis and 16 (62%) with Parkinson's disease were matched with 42 healthy controls. The overall median age was 39 years, median BMI was 25.3 kg/m2, and most patients were female (61.9%). Preoperative colorectal diagnoses included ulcerative colitis (83.3%), indeterminate colitis (9.5%), and Crohn's disease (7.1%). Patients with neurological diseases had higher ASA scores (class III, 57.1% vs. 21.4%; pConclusion Patients with multiple sclerosis or Parkinson’s disease differed in pouch function compared with healthy controls. Such patients should be counselled that their pouch function may be impaired. The rate of pouch failure was similar, showing its feasibility despite multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.